Average Reviews:
(More customer reviews)Had these in two offices (West Coast/NYC) for a little over a week. The firmware is highly unstable, even after being upgraded to the latest version from Cisco. These were installed by a highly-rated Cisco partner firm for our offices, and after trying to get the most basic features to stick we've all simply given up. The VPN is extremely slow and volatile, settings do not stick in the firmware ("Hey, didn't I just make that a UDP port forward? Why does it default to TCP when the setting is applied and saved?"), DNS errors (that Cisco acknowledged and "fixed") caused unpredictable browsing and Web services for users, there's no command-line interface only GUI, and port forwarding simply does not (even when Cisco support tried to fix it). Terrible routers that it turns out are re-branded Linksys (remember, Cisco bought Linksys not too long ago). Save yourself a headache and start with a 5505 if you're looking at this price point.
Click Here to see more reviews about: Cisco SA520W Security Appliance
Cisco SA520W-K9 Security Appliance 4 x 10/100/1000Base-T LAN, 1 x 10/100/1000Base-T WAN, 1 x 10/100/1000Base-T WAN, LAN & DMZ - IEEE 802.11n (draft)
Click here for more information about Cisco SA520W Security Appliance
No comments:
Post a Comment